James Montier argues that policy portfolios, risk parity, and glide-path funds mismeasure risk and overlook valuation. He favors benchmark-free strategic asset allocation that adjusts exposures to opportunities offered by markets, prioritizing real returns and investment judgment over rigid benchmarks and precise but potentially misleading performance measurement.
I Want to Break Free
GMO
James Montier
Article
1 Pages
Key Takeaways
Policy Claims Misunderstood: Asset allocation explained 93.6% of quarterly return variation, but did not generate 93.6% of returns.
Return Assumptions Strained: An 8% pension target required equities to return 10.5% when bonds offered 4%.
Risk Parity Tradeoffs: A 13/87 portfolio returned 9% versus 11% for 60/40 from 1980 to 2009. Top Figures/Charts