The Ins and Outs of Investing in Illiquid Assets

Robeco

Research

22 Pages

Robeco examines why investors allocate capital to illiquid assets and whether the expected liquidity premium adequately compensates for the risks involved. The paper explores the tradeoff between higher expected returns, transaction costs, and liquidity constraints. One example suggests investors may require more than a 4% annual premium to justify a 5 year lockup.

Key Takeaways

Liquidity Premium Required: A 5 year illiquidity period required a 4.3% annual premium in one framework, while a 10 year lockup required 6.0%.
Hidden Cost Impact: An illiquid asset needed a 3.4% gross return versus 3.0% for a liquid asset to achieve comparable net outcomes after costs.
Stress Period Risks: During the 2008 crisis, some private equity interests traded at discounts approaching 50%, highlighting the potential cost of forced liquidity.

Join our newsletter to have all of this content + Exclusive Newsletter Bonus Content delivered to your inbox every week

Related Content

Alternative Assets
Jul 2026
Alternative Assets
Jul 2026
Scroll to Top