TIFF Investment Management interviews Scott Malpass and Jay Willoughby to explore whether China is a compelling long-term investment or a structurally flawed one. The paper highlights a tension between China’s rapid economic rise and concerns around governance, arguing strong GDP growth has not consistently translated into investor returns.
Investing in China: Silk (Road) Purse or Sow’s Ear? An Interview with Scott Malpass and Jay Willoughby
TIFF Investment Management
Laurence B. Siegel
Research
13 Pages
Key Takeaways
Growth Vs Returns Gap: Despite decades of ~9% GDP growth, emerging markets like China have often underperformed developed equities, challenging the assumption that growth automatically drives returns.
Institutional Risk Premium: Governance differences and weaker investor protections create structural risks, with some investors suggesting China exposure indirectly via developed markets instead of direct allocation.
Allocation Still Rising: Institutional investors continue increasing exposure, with China now representing a meaningful share of global market cap near $16.6T despite underrepresentation in indices around 6%.