GMO’s quarterly letter explores whether today’s elevated asset prices reflect temporary distortions or a lasting decline in global discount rates. Ben Inker warns investors may face either mean reversion or decades of muted returns while Jeremy Grantham argues markets could “whimper” sideways instead of collapsing.
GMO Quarterly Letter 3Q 2016
GMO
Ben Inker, Jeremy Grantham
Research
26 Pages
Key Takeaways
Purgatory Vs. Hell: GMO’s September 2016 “Hell” portfolio held 58% risky assets versus 36% in “Purgatory,” with expected seven year returns of 2.2% and 0.9%, respectively.
Risk Parity Vulnerability: GMO shows naïve risk parity portfolios reached durations near 50 years by 2016, materially exceeding traditional 60/40 portfolios during historically low bond yields.
Long Term Funding Gap: GMO estimates a fully funded pension using 7.3% return assumptions would fall to 80% funded in Purgatory and 67% funded in Hell.